Vychodoslovensky pravek online10/30/2022 ![]() ![]() But the beginning of what will be the great debate on the nature of the prehistoric war, or ritual or real, coincides with the first two real works focused on the violence in prehistoric society, by is theory by Clastres who denied the real violence in the prehistoric societies, as Leroi Gouran, where hunting violence was linked to violence of the war, and the reply to tinted out by Lehoerff. A first approach on prehistoric war had been by Childe in which we doubt the peaceful nature of primitive populations and the war as a factor linked to the most advanced societies. Violence and warfare in the pre and protohistoric societies are topics dealt with over several decades and under various perspectives. Object of the present work will be the review of the work, the state of the art and future research horizons on the warfare in the Bronze Age in the parts of Europe not affected by State-owned societies such as the Aegean civilizations: these include all the European regions that between the end of the third millennium and the first quarter of the first millennium BC know a chiefdom societies and that Jaques Briard has defined "barbaric Europe” (1976). Keywords: European Bronze Age Warfare Literature review New perspectives Fashion Barbaric Europe Protohistoric Perspective Aegean civilizations Archeology Anthropology Paleopathology Primatological Paleodemographic Ethnography Psychology So will be discuss what the commonly accepted theories and what also remain subject of doubt and debate to draw a perspective for the future. Recent trends are analyzed according to various perspectives: generals, theoretical, study of material cultures and context, and interpretative tendencies. ![]() Violence and warfare in Bronze Age in "barbarian Europe”, to use an expression by Jaques Briard, can be defined as a "fashion” since the mid-2000s. But the warfare in the European Bronze Age up to a decade ago, it was dealt marginally. Scholars there were mainly interested on the origins of violence in mankind, on the fighting in the Neolithic or, if Bronze Age, on the wars in the empires of the Near East or in the Minoan civilization. But investigation specifically on Bronze Age period, when some tools are exclusively created for fight and the warrior societies are emerging, is always young. Research on prehistoric warfare is in progress since 60 years. Some remarks on today vision of the Bronze Age warfare in the "barbaric" Europe.Warfare in European Bronze Age a State of Question.From Serbia, there are about 12 tumuli sites known, depending on the definition and secure attribution of Yamnaya tumuli and burials. 70 burials which can be attributed to the Yamnaya. About 45 sites with 60 excavated tumuli are known from Hungary, ranging from a single excavated tumulus on a site, as occurs in most cases, up to the 11 tumuli excavated out of 33 counted at the Kétegyháza site. About 500 excavated tumuli and more than a thousand graves from the modern day European countries of Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and Hungary testify to their constructors: populations of the “ Yamnaya”, known also under the terms of “ Yamna Culture”, “ Pit Grave Culture” or “ Ochre Grave Culture”. The very origin of their erection here often goes back to the 4th and the 3rd millennium cal. Ten thousand round tumuli characterize the plains around the lower Danube and its tributaries, and in the central Carpathian basin. Yamnaya groups and tumuli west of the Black Sea ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |